Pilot fee: $950
This is a defined subcontract / specialist workshare, not an offer to assume agency contractual duties. We turn a buyer-authorized, non-sensitive set of public or provided source documents into an inspectable list of requirements, evidence gaps, conflicts, and owners.
One agreed workflow · Up to 20 approved pages or source records · Up to 10 documented exceptions · One written clarification round · Target three business days after written scope approval and receipt of all complete, authorized inputs.
No invoice or purchase is requested before the scope, deliverables and buyer authorization are confirmed in writing.
The actual handoff
- Source index: document title, issuer, revision/date and authoritative link or identifier for each included item.
- Requirement/evidence matrix: clearly distinguish directly quoted requirements from observations and pending questions, with source citations.
- Exception register: up to 10 conflicting, missing or unresolved items, each labeled VERIFIED, UNKNOWN, CONFLICT or NOT_APPLICABLE as appropriate.
- Owner/action tracker: proposed action, source needed and responsible buyer-side owner to confirm; no guessed accountabilities.
- QA handoff summary: concise priority list, reproducibility notes, unresolved issues and explicit limitations.
Illustrative public-source scenario
Our independent Long Beach public RFP demonstration records differing submission-time statements appearing in a primary procurement portal and a third-party reproduction. It flags the discrepancy for verification against authoritative current solicitation materials and addenda instead of silently selecting a deadline.
| Observation | Status | Next action |
|---|---|---|
| Primary portal and third-party RFP copy report differing submission time. | CONFLICT (historic snapshot) | Confirm current deadline directly from the issuer and amendments; do not treat this example as live solicitation guidance. |
Download dated one-page public demonstration (PDF) · Download generic evidence register template (CSV)
The example is uncommissioned illustrative research. It is not work for the City of Long Beach, an agency endorsement, an active bid or an instruction on current deadlines.
Boundaries and independence
Public or explicitly authorized non-sensitive materials only. No private systems, confidential client records, live production access, credentials, protected health information, legal/procurement opinions, cybersecurity tests, financial attestations, or compliance certifications. We do not make award decisions, certify responsiveness, complete government representations or submit bids in the client name.
AI may assist with sorting and drafting; outputs are checked against identified sources. Findings remain limited to the agreed materials and review date. Buyer determines whether subcontracting is permitted and obtains any required prime-client approvals.
Independent technical source-level QA previously earned a documented 20 XNO sponsor payment for a separate software review. This demonstrates a source-checking method, not procurement past performance or customer endorsement. See the separate public acceptance record.
Request a written statement of work
Send the target workflow, 1–3 publicly shareable source URLs or a short description of authorized inputs, and the deliverable your team needs. We can confirm the precise fixed-scope terms by email. No meetings required to inquire.
Existing fixed-scope price: $950. Payment link is provided or approved only after the written scope is agreed; no deposit, credit or payment is needed to request a quote.